Connect with us


A MARVEL MANDATE: The movie-making machine might have broken with ‘Doctor Strange’

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

When this whole superhero universe thing was concocted by Marvel many moons ago, it all felt too good to be true. As a lifelong comic-book reader and proud aficionado of all-things geek, I was pleased as punch at the idea of a connected universe where all my favorite childhood heroes could share the screen and have awesome adventures. It started out well. Viewers got Robert Downey Jr. as Iron Man (awesome), and a handful of well-known heroes, like Captain America and Thor, in some better-than-average blockbusters. Then the Avengers came: the culmination of a carefully plotted blueprint, Earth’s mightiest mortals banding together to save the world. And it was good.

OUT OF PLACE: Lots of talent but poor execution in Marvel’s ‘Doctor Strange.’ Photo by Film Frame.

OUT OF PLACE: Lots of talent but poor execution in Marvel’s ‘Doctor Strange.’ Photo by Film Frame.

After, they basically did a copy/paste of everything that worked in the first phase of films. Another “Iron Man,” another “Thor,” another “Captain America.” Everything started to feel a little less novel and a little more formulaic. The second Avengers film wore out its welcome very quickly. The Marvel movies went from a cause to celebrate to a movie-making machine that started to feel like an all-too familiar form factor. It’s been a strange experience: It finally feels as though the geeks of the world are getting everything they wished for. But, like every single story ever written about wish fulfillment, we never considered there may be a price for this infinite amount of gratification.

I hoped Marvel’s latest blockbuster, “Doctor Strange,” would help rekindle my interest in the comic-book adaptations. I’ve always been a fan of the character; a 1960’s creation of legendary artist Steve Ditko (and to a lesser degree, Stan Lee), Doctor Strange was a wise wizard dealing with interdimensional threats. In the film, he starts as a brilliant, arrogant neurosurgeon who cares little for the world around him.  Status, power and admiration were his goals—that is, until a terrible accident leaves him without the use of his hands. Unable to repair the nerve damage that has ruined his life, Stephen Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch) turns to the east in search of nontraditional techniques to restore his broken body. It is there he encounters Baron Mordo (Chiwetel Ejiofor) and the mysterious Ancient One (Tilda Swinton).

Strange is taken on a journey through the limitless worlds parallel to our own. Those trained in the mystic arts can tap into these worlds and create portals, weapons and spells that make the impossible anything but. The first act of “Doctor Strange” seemed promising; it already felt like a much more serious Marvel film than its predecessors. Strange starts off as a patently unlikable jerk who handles the aftermath of his accident horribly. It felt like the first chance a very serious character was given time to be developed in a Marvel movie. For a few brief moments, I embraced the anticipation. Then it happened: The film became a four-quadrant crowd-pleasing movie that turned a somewhat serious tale into a tonally spastic story, which tries to be all things to all people.

All the potential is ruined by two aspects: a need for total validation from audiences and some horrible, cringe-worthy attempts at injecting humor into the story. The tonal shifts were jarring. The film tried to be dark and dramatic, and then it began to undermine a solid foundation by making terrible pop-culture jokes and physical gags which felt wildly out of place. There were moments I stared at the screen, slack-jawed aghast at the massive swings from light to dark. It was like a cinematic pendulum, swinging back and forth between high drama and low-brow yuckity yucks. I can’t remember a film that felt so inconsistent in terms of what movie it was trying to be.

By the film’s third act, even some very clever moments were wasted on a below-average movie that felt like a corporate mandate from Marvel. Does every Marvel movie have to contain a wise-cracking protagonist who makes jokes whenever situations become tense? Apparently, every hero in the Marvel universe is supposed to have the power of comedic timing. But it just doesn’t work. Cumberbatch is such a great dramatic actor, but his attempts at levity are staged with the grace of an acrobat suffering from an inner-ear disorder while working without a net. It gets real messy, real quick.

And it sucks because I can see how good this movie could have been had there not been so many attempts to broaden the audience. This movie suffers because of the formula. There is no difference between “Doctor Strange” and any other Marvel flick. There are some slicker visuals, and the final showdown is a lot more cerebral.

Really, the film is no different than “Iron Man,” “Ant-Man” or “Thor.” The cadence is the same, the characters are basically the same, and the villain is once again an inconsequential afterthought. Every villain in the Marvel movies might as well wear all white with the word “VILLAIN” scrawled across their backs. It’s no less generic than what they’re currently offering.

It’s unfortunate, too, because there is a lot of talent in this movie. I would love to see what kind of “Doctor Strange” could be made by the same people in an unbridled cinematic world—where all the edges aren’t sanded down to harmless curves. It could have been interesting. 

Doctor Strange
Two and a half out of five
Rated PG-13
Directed by Scott Derrickson
Starring Benedict Cumberbatch, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Rachel McAdams, Tilda Swinton

Newsletter Signup


  1. SonnyK

    November 15, 2016 at 5:13 pm

    I’m guessing the author was a fan of the Christopher Nolan Batman movies as well. He apparently wants everything dark and brooding (and bad, oh so very, very bad).

    I happen to like the humour. I happen to enjoy the light hearted moments AND the high-drama.

    We don’t need a return to the relentlessly dark and depressing formula of the CN Movies. Marvel comics is not and has never been about that. Please don’t expect the movies to be as well. Hey! Even DC comics, while darker than Marvel in general, have never been w/out their humour and light moments.

    These movies are supposed to be “fun”, not high-art.

  2. Jb

    November 15, 2016 at 7:40 pm

    I’m reading this review I was constantly bored by his attempt at writing a review. It’s as if he tries to stick to the template that every critic since 2010 has followed. Thinking being negative about every aspect of everything. He leaves me wondering if he actually has an original thought. My recommendation is that he bend over and pry the stick out from his back side.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Welcome Home, Heath:


WELCOME HOME: Annie Tracy celebrates her latest EP back in ILM



Best Of Wilmington

A BAFFLING SUCCESS: ‘Batman v Superman’ ain’t half bad


Encore Magazine regularly covers topics pertaining to news, arts, entertainment, food, and city life in Wilmington. It also maintains schedules and listings of local events like concerts, festivals, live performance art and think-tank events. Encore Magazine is an entity of H&P Media, which also powers Wilmington’s local ticketing platform, Print and online editions are updated every Wednesday.

Newsletter Signup

© 2019 | "Your Alternative Weekly Voice"

Newsletter Signup

Thank you for signing up for our newsletter.